Headshot of Susan Sorenson

Susan B. Sorenson, PhD

  • Professor of Social Policy

  • Professor of Health & Societies

  • Senior Fellow in Public Health

  • Director, The Ortner Center on Violence & Abuse in Relationships

3815 Walnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104-6179
  • office: 215.573.1169
  • fax: 215.573.2791

Research Interests

Public health

Epidemiology and prevention of violence, including homicide, suicide, sexual assault, child abuse, battering, & firearms

Violence against women as a public health issue

Firearms as a consumer product

Professor Susan B. Sorenson has a unique interdisciplinary background in epidemiology, sociology, and psychology. She moved to Penn in 2006 after more than 20 years at the UCLA School of Public Health. Since 1986, she has taught a graduate course in family and sexual violence – the first violence prevention course in a school of public health in the nation. She currently teaches three courses that she developed: Violence in Relationships (graduate); Guns and Love Gone Bad (undergrad); and Foundations of Public Health (undergrad).

With nearly 150 publications to her credit, Professor Sorenson has published widely in the epidemiology and prevention of violence, including the areas of homicide, suicide, sexual assault, child abuse, battering, and firearms. She helped establish violence against women as a public health issue and furthered the study of firearms as a consumer product. A primary focus of her work is the social context in which violence occurs, specifically, the norms that shape whether and how violence is tolerated.

In addition to her academic work, Dr. Sorenson has served on the board of directors and advisory boards of local community-based organizations, state government agencies, and university injury prevention centers. In 1991, she co-founded the Violence Prevention Coalition of Greater Los Angeles, a broad coalition of agencies and individuals which continues to this day. She has provided invited testimony on violence prevention at the local, state, and federal levels.

Professor Sorenson has served in multiple advisory roles. She was a member of the National Academy of Science’s Panel on Research on Violence Against Women, a consultant to President Clinton’s National Advisory Council on Violence Against Women, a consultant to UNICEF’s May 2000 report on Domestic Violence Against Women and Girls, a member of the advisory panel for the 2001 U.S. Surgeon General’s Report on Youth Violence, author of a 2008 WHO report on health indicators of violence against children in low- and middle-income countries, and a member of the 2013 Institute of Medicine committee on Priorities for a Public Health Research Agenda to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-related Violence. She currently is serving a second term on the Committee on Law and Justice for the National Academy of Sciences.

Publications

Professor Sorenson’s contributions to science include framing violence against women as a public health issue, studying firearms as a consumer product, and applying multiple and emerging research methods to the study of the epidemiology and prevention of violence. Policy implications are a core aspect of her research. For a copy of any of these articles or others by Professor Sorenson, please see Scholarly Commons or contact Professor Sorenson.

Sorenson SB, Joshi M, Sivitz E. Knowing a sexual assault victim or perpetrator: A stratified random sample of undergraduates at one university. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2014; 29:394-416.

In a stratified random sample of 2,400 undergraduates, nearly two thirds (64.5%) reported that they know one or more women who were a victim of any one of eight types of sexual assault, and over half (52.4%) reported that they know one or more men who perpetrated any of the types of sexual assault. Most students reported knowing victims and perpetrators of multiple types of assault. Students’ preexisting personal knowledge should be included in assessments of program effectiveness and, ideally, in program design.

Thomas KA, Joshi M, Sorenson SB. “Do you know what it feels like to drown?”: Strangulation as coercive control in intimate relationships. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2014; 38, 124-137.

We extended prior work by using grounded theory in a qualitative study to explore women’s experiences of, thoughts about, and reactions to being strangled. Each of the 17 domestic violence shelter residents had been strangled at least once by an intimate partner; most had survived multiple strangulations. Despite other severe abuse and a high level of fear, all were shocked that their partner strangled them. Participants reported an intense sense of vulnerability when they recognized during the assault how easily they could be killed by their partner. Nonetheless, they seemed to think of strangulation, not as a failed murder attempt, but as a way to exert power.

Sorenson SB, Shi R, Zhang J, Xue J. Self-presentation on the web: Agencies serving abused and assaulted women. American Journal of Public Health, 2014; 104: 702–707.

In a 10% systematic sample of 3774 agencies listed in two national directories, we examined the content and usability of the websites of agencies serving women victims of violence. The service and marketing functions were met fairly well by the agency home pages, but usability (particularly readability and offer of a mobile version) and efforts to increase user safety could be improved. The one third of agencies that lack a website will not reach the substantial portion of the population that uses the Internet to find health information and other resources.

Sorenson SB, Joshi M, Sivitz E. A systematic review of the epidemiology of nonfatal strangulation, a human rights and health concern. American Journal of Public Health, 2014; 104: e54–e61.

Few specific acts of nonfatal abuse are associated with as wide of a range of health problems or are as difficult to detect as strangulation. In the first systematic review of the epidemiology of strangulation, we identified 23 articles based on 11 surveys of 75,875 individuals in 9 countries in 4 regions of the world. Women are more likely than men to report that they were strangled by an intimate partner. Strangulation does not require access to a particular weapon, and its use is not restricted to a specific geographic region. A focus on specific acts, such as strangulation and acid burnings, as well as parallels to other rights violations (e.g., water boarding) may help convey to policymakers and others the risk to and terror experienced by those being abused.

Sorenson SB. Assessing views about gun violence reduction policy: A look at type of violence and expected effectiveness. Preventive Medicine, 2015, 79: 50-54.

We examined the content and usability of the websites in a systematic 10% sample of 3774 agencies serving women victims of violence. The service and marketing functions were met fairly well by the agency home pages, but usability (particularly readability and offer of a mobile version) and efforts to increase user safety could be improved. The one third of agencies that lack a website will not reach the substantial portion of the population that uses the Internet to find health information and other resources.

Berk RA, Sorenson SB, Barnes G. Forecasting domestic violence: A machine learning approach to help inform arraignment decisions. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 2016; 13: 94-115.

Arguably the most important decision at an arraignment is whether to release an offender until the date of his or her next scheduled court appearance. Using 28,000 arraignment cases from a major metropolitan area in which an offender faces domestic violence charges, one of three possible post-arraignment outcomes was forecasted to occur within two years: (1) a domestic violence arrest associated with a physical injury, (2) a domestic violence arrest not associated with a physical injury, and (3) no arrests for domestic violence. We incorporated asymmetric costs for different kinds of forecasting errors so that very strong statistical evidence is required before an offender is forecasted to be a good risk. Using the decision tool, the number of re-arrests for domestic violence could be cut in half.

Thomas KA, Sorenson SB, Joshi M. “Consent is Good, Joyous, Sexy”: A banner campaign to market consent to college students. Journal of American College Health, 2016; 64(8): 639-650.

One responsibility of U.S. colleges is to prevent rape and sexual assault of and by students. In fact, federal law mandates, among other things, that colleges and universities receiving federal funding offer sexual assault prevention programs. Using an experimental design embedded in an online survey following a campus exhibit, we found that colorful banners with pithy, upbeat messages hold promise for engaging undergraduates in conversations and proactive activities related to sexual assault prevention.

Sorenson SB. Guns in intimate partner violence:  Comparing incidents that involve a gun, other weapon, or no weapon. Journal of Women’s Health, 2017; 26(3):249-258.

In this study of 35,413 intimate partner calls for assistance, 1% involved a gun. A gun was used most often (about two-thirds of the time) to threaten the partner; in 15% of the gun cases, the offender pistol whipped, shot at, or shot the victim. The use of a gun was associated with more violent behaviors by the abuser and more negative outcomes for the victim. The violent behaviors and negative outcomes are, generally speaking, even worse when another type of weapon is used. Guns heighten fear and compliance, which likely reduces willingness to end the relationship, thus, promoting chronic abuse. Documentation of officer compliance with state law could be improved.

Sorenson SB, Schut R. Non-fatal gun use in intimate partner violence: A systematic review of the literature. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, published online ahead of print, September 2016.

This paper presents the first systematic review of a topic that has received relatively little attention from researchers interested in violence against women: the prevalence of intimate partners’ non-fatal use of guns. The available information indicates that the number of U.S. women alive today who have had an intimate partner use a gun against them is substantial: About 4.5 million have had an intimate partner threaten them with a gun and nearly one million have been shot or shot at by an intimate partner. Implications for policy, practice, and research are discussed, all of which include expanding an implicit focus on homicide to include an intimate partner’s non-fatal use of a gun.

Cardoso L, Sorenson SB. Violence against women and household ownership of radios, computers, and phones in 20 countries. American Journal of Public Health, 2017; 107(7):1175–1181.

Sometimes the private sector creates unintended consequences. We investigated the possibility of one with global consequences – the proliferation of information and communication technology.

Cross-sectional data collected in 20 low- and middle-income countries that participated in UNICEF’s Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys during 2006 through 2014, assess the association between such technologies and justifications for wife beating. The 133,843 women participants were asked whether a husband is justified in beating his wife under five circumstances: if she goes out without telling him, neglects the children, argues with him, refuses to have sex, or burns the food.

Household ownership of a radio, computer, fixed phone, or mobile phone was associated with a higher likelihood of rejecting wife-beating; the largest effect was having a computer. These findings were not related to finances – independent of both country development and household wealth, the more such technologies, the more likely women were to reject justifications for wife-beating.